![]() ![]() This “productivity suite” for Apple Mail is ultimately “just” a plug-in with a connected external server solution, but it has so many helpful features and such a good operating concept that I've been using it for years - and I'm happy with it. But in the end I found the good grain: Mail butler. You can see that there is a lot of chaff and little wheat on this subject. Some didn't even run with the latest versions of macOS. Either they were big crap from the user interface or they caused Apple Mail to crash. My solution: MailbutlerĪfter several plugins that have "copied" one or the other feature of my wish list, I was not really happy with any plugin. For this reason, I prefer to stick with Apple Mail and try to expand its functions to my liking. If I switched, I would think of ten other things that I would miss. That's just one of the advantages of using Apple Mail. This mail program has most of the functions that I miss in Apple Mail.įor example, if I search for a person on the iPhone, iPad or Mac, addresses, emails and phone numbers that Siri or Spotlight found in the emails are automatically suggested. If I had to choose an alternative mail client, I would definitely choose Canary Mail. I know there are solutions like Thunderbird Mail, Spark, canary mail or Airmailall of which more or less map such features, but for me there is a clear disadvantage of these mail programs: They are not nearly as well integrated in iOS and macOS as is the case with Apple Mail - of course they cannot, because Apple simply has more technical options here than the developers of the other mail clients. Apple Mail on the Mac does not offer an option for this either. It's a total waste of time and a pain in the ass to submit bugs to Apple.A third feature that some readers would like to have in Mail besides me is that Tracking the receipt and opening of a sent email. Years or months later after submitting a bug that happens not to be closed as duplicate of another bug, they get closed because a new version of macOS is released, and you are encouraged to resubmit your report if it still affects the new version, which inevitably it does.Įven if the bug is in some open source component, and you provide a patch, it is ignored and eventually closed as explained above. The bugs are never fixed, at least no bug that I have ever reported has been fixed. The bugs are almost always closed as duplicate of another bug, which, of course, you can't see because the bug tracker is private. Sometimes this happens even if they asked you to try the beta version! ![]() When you try to reproduce the bug on multiple versions, they close your bug if you reproduced it on beta versions, because beta versions are unsupported, even though the bug affects release versions. They take forever to answer, and ask for things that you have already provided in your original issue. I can’t recall whether Activity Monitor has any historical/time-series views built in? If it does, then if you hide Activity Monitor with those active, it should keep using CPU, to gather the data for that view, whether it’s rendering it or not. This might be down to Activity Monitor being written to respond to a message letting it know that its view is entirely obscured, and the Activity Monitor main-window view-controller deciding in response that there’s no point in it polling the system if all it’s going to do when re-visible is discard all the stuff it learned in the mean time and re-poll again to get the newest data for the view. ![]() > It does for me, which is why I keep it hidden when I’m not actively using it. (They might have a lower update rate, though.) I believe it’s just using the same call into the compositor that Mission Control uses to display your windows and spaces. Nah, it updates (.as far as I can recall.) Try opening a chat client, minimizing the chat window, and then sending a message from another device to yourself. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |